View Thread

Paper or plastic?

  • 1.  Paper or plastic?

    Posted 08-29-2008 12:12
    If I recall correctly, someone posted a question on this list a while back, asking if there was any supporting information available about the tradeoffs between using paper or plastic bags.  It might even have been my good buddy, Jon Entine.  Today, I received the following e-mail from David Chandler that links to a Washington Post article providing some specifics -- and concludes that both stink, environmentally speaking.  I hope folks might find it of some interest.
     
    Best,
    Mike
     
    ********************
    Michael L. Barnett, PhD
    University of South Florida
    College of Business Administration
    Department of Management & Organization
    4202 E. Fowler Avenue, BSN 3527
    Tampa, FL 33620-5500
    Phone: 813-974-1727
    Fax: 813-974-1734
     
    View my research on my SSRN Author page:
    <http://ssrn.com/author=414796>
     
    *****

    The article in the url below is a depressing comparison between paper or plastic bags to see which imposes the greater environmental burden, in terms of both production, consumption, and disposal:

     

    "Paper or Plastic? We hear the question almost every time we go grocery shopping. Some shoppers answer automatically; plastic - convinced that they are making a better choice for the environment. Others ask for paper, believing the very same thing. The reality is that both paper and plastic bogs gobble up natural resources and cause significant pollution. When you weigh all the costs to the environment, you might just choose to reuse."

     

    There are some surprising statistics, but the upshot is that neither is particularly good:

     

    "It takes more than four times as much energy to manufacture a paper bag as it does a plastic bag. The production of paper bags generates 70 percent more air and 50 times more water pollutants than production of plastic bags."

     

    "... it can cost $4,000 to process and recycle 1 ton of plastic bags. This can then be sold on the commodities market for about $32."

     

    "More often than not, bags collected for recycling never get recycled. A growing trend is to ship them to countries such as India and China, where they are cheaply incinerated under more lax environmental laws. Paper is degradable, but it cannot completely break down in modern landfills because of the lack of water, light, oxygen and other necessary elements. About 95 percent of garbage is buried beneath layers of soil that make it difficult for air and sunlight to reach it."

     

    An editorial at the Washington Post in July 2007 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/05/AR2007070501806.html) makes a similar point in response to a proposal to ban plastic shopping bags in Maryland:

     

    "The problem, opponents of the idea counter, is that paper bags are harmful, too: They cost more to make, they gobble up more resources to transport, and recycling them causes more pollution than recycling plastic. The argument for depriving Annapolis residents of their plastic bags is far from made."

     

    It seems there is only one thing on which most people can agree:

     

    "Disposable shopping bags of any type are wasteful, and the best outcome would be for customers to reuse bags instead."

     

    Have a good weekend.

    Dave

     

    Bill Werther & David Chandler

    Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility

    © Sage Publications, 2006

    http://www.sagepub.com/Werther

     

    'More than Meets the Eye: Paper or Plastic?'

    by Brenna Maloney and Laura Stanton

    989 words

    4 October, 2007

    The Washington Post

    FINAL

     

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/10/03/GR2007100301385.html