I saw Al Gore speaking about climate change in Melbourne. He was speaking to promote his investment fund. I suppose it is necessary to align and balance financial interests with sustainability; that is an idea behind triple bottom line. However, Gore personally benefits financially from promoting all this stuff. When Gore was VP he was not profiting from an investment fund that he created. Not that this is bad. I think it is good. However, it helps to explain why he says what he says.
Lionel Boxer CD PhD MBA BTech(IndEng) - 0411267256
Associate of RMIT University -
lionel.boxer@rmit.edu.au
Graduate School of Business
my "Assessment of Quality Systems with Positioning Theory"
now in a googe book - see link at
http://intergon.net
>>> Alfred Marcus <
amarcus@UMN.EDU> 10/03/10 1:33 AM >>>
It is an interesting question -- does Gore serve the issue of climate change
well or not.His documentary is more about himself than about climate change
I feel and therefore given that there is much better material out there like
the PBS special "What's Up with the Weather" I have decided not to play it
in class. When Gore was v.p. he did very little to really advance
environmental issues, in my opinion. Has anybody actually read his new book?
How good is it? The reviews have been positive but I am skeptical.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Bruce Clemens <
bclemens@wnec.edu> wrote:
> Jon,
>
> I have to add my exuberant agreement to one part of your posting - specific
> climatic events cannot be linked to global climate change. However, I doubt
> climate scientists would consider Mr. Gore one of their worst enemies.
> Thank you for keeping this posting civil (and almost polite), what's
> happening to you in your old age:-)? Thank you, Charles, for sharing the
> Gore piece...
>
> Cheers...
>
> Bruce
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Jon Entine <
jon@jonentine.com> wrote:
>
>> Al Gore has become his own worst enemy. He writes a very reasoned piece at
>> every step of the way and then shoots himself--and scientists trying to stem
>> the tide of global climate reactionaries--by making the utterly stupid
>> statement linking Northeast snow storms to changing climate. The facts are
>> clear:
>>
>> (1) we are in a long term trend secular trend towards a warming climate
>> which will have severe repurcussions over the long term
>>
>> (2) we are in a short term cyclical trend towards climate moderation and
>> even slight cooling---this is a variation around the long term secular trend
>>
>> (3) recent "events" such as the winter storms and Katrina --both of which
>> occurred during the cyclical cooling--cannot be linked to global warming, as
>> Gore has tried to do in both examples.
>>
>> Climate change scientists have made this point time and again. Weather
>> 'events' are incredibly complicated with innumerable factors affecting it.
>> Minute trends in weather---the current cooling trend or the long term
>> warming trend--may or may not have contributed a lot or a little.
>>
>> Every time Gore puts his foot in his mouth and makes these silly,
>> scientifically ignorant statements he undermines the careful work of climate
>> science and fuels the loonies on the far right. It's sad. He's becoming
>> science's worst enemy on this issue.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Charles Wankel [mailto:
wankelc@VERIZON.NET]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2010 07:15 AM
>> To:
ONE-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
>> Subject: Increased snow in coastal areas like NE USA is from global
>> warming
>>
>> Increased snow in coastal areas like NE USA is from global warming. That
>> is
>> one of the things I learned from reading the popular (among New York
>> Times
>> readers) op ed piece by Al Gore available at:
>>
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/opinion/28gore.html
>>
>>
>>
>> "I, for one, genuinely wish that the climate crisis were an illusion."
>>
>>
>>
>> "we are continuing to dump 90 million tons of global-warming pollution
>> every
>> 24 hours into the atmosphere"
>>
>>
>>
>> "Some news media organizations now present showmen masquerading as
>> political
>> thinkers who package hatred and divisiveness as entertainment."
>>
>>
>>
>> "We have overcome existential threats before. Winston Churchill is widely
>> quoted as having said, "Sometimes doing your best is not good enough.
>> Sometimes, you must do what is required." Now is that time. Public
>> officials
>> must rise to this challenge by doing what is required; and the public
>> must
>> demand that they do so - or must replace them."
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Charles Wankel
>>
>> St. John's University, New York
>>
>> ONE-L list bolsterer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bruce Clemens PhD PE
> Management Department
> School of Business
> 109 Churchill Hall
> Western New England College
> 1215 Wilbraham Road
> Springfield MA 01119
> Phone: 413-782-1500
> Fax: 413-796-2068
>
bclemens@wnec.edu
> Campus mailbox number: C5433
>
> Please consider your environmental responsibilities before printing this
> e-mail
>
--
Alfred A. Marcus
Professor and Spencer Chair in Strategy and Technological Leadership
University of Minnesota
Carlson School of Management
Strategic Management and Organization Department
Minneapolis, MN. 55455 USA
612 624 2812
amarcus@umn.edu