With biannual TRI - TRI as one of the main datasources for researchers
in corporate environmental behavior is lost, or at least poses some
statistical challenges.
Maybe that is a good thing, as TRI is very tempting to use, but its
accuracy is questionable...
Is questionable data better than no data?!
Dinah Koehler, Sc.D.
Economics and Decision Sciences Research
National Center for Environmental Research
8722F, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
202-343-9687
202-233-0678 (fax)
Courier Delivery Address:
USEPA, NCER
Room 3319E Woodies Bldg
1025 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20004-1409
Reid Lifset
<reid.lifset@YAL
E.EDU> To
Sent by:
ONE-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU Organizations cc
and the Natural
Environment Subject
Discussion Re: question re. epiphanies and
<ONE-L@AOMLISTS. environmental performance in
PACE.EDU> business
12/02/2005 08:58
AM
Please respond
to
Organizations
and the Natural
Environment
Discussion
<ONE-L@AOMLISTS.
PACE.EDU>
Dinah's questions highlight the significance of
the White House's proposal to change the
reporting requirements for TRI annual to biannual.
At 02:15 PM 12/1/2005,
Koehler.Dinah@EPAMAIL.EPA.GOV wrote:
>So does this mean that we should expect corporate environmental
>performance to "improve" in spurts? No smooth improvements (i.e.
curves)
>in performance over time?
>What does this mean for empirical analyses? Are annual data
>appropriate/sufficient? Averages over time? Monthly better? WHAT IS
>AVAILABLE?!
>Have you (or others) analyzed the relative importance of personal
>networks (knowledge transfer/networks) vs. other variables that might
>affect environmental performance?
>
>Dinah Koehler, Sc.D.
>Economics and Decision Sciences Research
>National Center for Environmental Research
>8722F, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
>Washington, DC 20460
>202-343-9687
>202-233-0678 (fax)
>
>Courier Delivery Address:
>USEPA, NCER
>Room 3319E Woodies Bldg
>1025 F Street NW
>Washington, DC 20004-1409
>
>
>
>
roome@FSW.EUR.NL
> Sent by:
> Organizations
To
> and the Natural
ONE-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
> Environment
cc
> Discussion
> <ONE-L@AOMLISTS.
Subject
> PACE.EDU> Re: question re. epiphanies and
> environmental performance in
> business
> 12/01/2005 10:48
> AM
>
>
> Please respond
> to
> Organizations
> and the Natural
> Environment
> Discussion
> <ONE-L@AOMLISTS.
> PACE.EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Dinah,
>
>from 1997-2001 we had a grant to undertake a longitudinal study in real
>time of corporate environmental management. We found lots of examples
>of
>dis-continuities in practice arising from people leaving and issues
like
>mergers and acquisitions. In particular when key people left companies
>their networks were also often lost.
>
>Nigel Roome
>
> > visionaries are one thing...
> > has anyone done any research to figure out what happens to an
> > organization when the enviro visionary leaves? Does the effort die -
>if
> > so, then why should we be so excited about visionaries?
> > I recall some chatter about such an event at Monsanto, but forget
the
> > details of who was involved and what happened.
> >
> >
> > Dinah Koehler, Sc.D.
> > Economics and Decision Sciences Research
> > National Center for Environmental Research
> > 8722F, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
> > Washington, DC 20460
> > 202-343-9687
> > 202-233-0678 (fax)
> >
> > Courier Delivery Address:
> > USEPA, NCER
> > Room 3319E Woodies Bldg
> > 1025 F Street NW
> > Washington, DC 20004-1409
> >
> >
> >
> >
roome@FSW.EUR.NL
> > Sent by:
> > Organizations
>To
> > and the Natural
ONE-L@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
> > Environment
>cc
> > Discussion
> > <ONE-L@AOMLISTS.
>Subject
> > PACE.EDU> Re: question re. epiphanies
and
> > environmental performance in
> > business
> > 11/30/2005 02:05
> > AM
> >
> >
> > Please respond
> > to
> > Organizations
> > and the Natural
> > Environment
> > Discussion
> > <ONE-L@AOMLISTS.
> > PACE.EDU>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings ONE-L,
> >
> > A coiuple of thoughts re: Kurt Fischer's questions.
> >
> > 1. It seems to me that there are many senior managers who have
>embarked
> > on
> > corporate environmental practices for managerial reasons and then
>built
> > in
> > very deep personal commitments as they discover this as part of
their
> > 'life mission'. David Buzzelli from Dow, Herman Mulder fromn ABN
>Amro,
> > Ray Anderson from Interface. The interesting thing is the way this
> > moves
> > from a position of dealing with an external concern or issue to
>building
> > the develop and practice of corporate enviornmental management into
> > their
> > personal identity.
> >
> > 2. Second we all know that much of CEM is rhetorical. Sometimes
> > greenwash, sometimes because vision, by definition, is where you
want
>to
> > go not where you are. But I want to draw also on the profound
> > difference
> > between the perspectives of anglo-saxon ideas of law and roman
>catholic
> > notions of law. To anglo-saxons laws generally set minimum
standards.
> > You meet these or not. In catholic thinking laws are set as
standards
> > to
> > aspire to but with a recognition that humans are mortal and flawed
and
> > may
> > not get to these standards. But in aspiring to them they are doing
> > pretty
> > well.
> >
> > I wonder if these ideas draw comment??
> >
> > Nigel Roome
> >
> >
> >
> >> Greetings, ONE-L,
> >>
> >> I̢۪m looking for some citations for ar a paper and talk I̢۪m
>preparing,
> > working
> >> tittitle “From Epiphany to Environmental Belief.â€Â
>Â
> >>
> >> Our discussion of a couple of weeks ago about Ray Anderson that
Andy
> >> Hoffman started and on epiphanies got me wondering if anyone has
> > published
> >> analytical and critical comparisons to proselytizing religious
> >> organizations, looking at how business leaders went or might go
from
> >> environmental epiphany to environmental belief, zeal, and
management.
> >> Critical in the sense of looking at not only at the environmental
> > belief
> >> structure as translated into business plan, but also at
environmental
> >> record, sustainability indicators, and business (financial)
> > performance.
> >>
> >> For a couple of starting points re. religious belief and
> > organizational
> >> management, I am looking at the new book on Joseph Smith by Richard
> > Lyman
> >> Bushman and Malcolm Gladwell̢۪s September 12 New Yorker article
on
> >> Rickick
> >> Warren.
> >>
> >> Can anyone point me toward citations of publications that 1) look
on
> >> environmental management as religious or evangelical quest or
secular
> >> religion, or 2) that draw lessons for environmental management from
> >> religion management?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Kurt
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Kurt Fischer
> >> The Greening of Industry Network
> >> tel 781.646.4596 fax 781.646.4189
> >
kurt.fischer@greeningofindustry.org
> >> JOIN GIN!
http://www.greeningofindustry.org/
> >> <http://www.greeningofindustry.org/>
> >>
> >> Dates to note:
> >> February 17-18, 2006: Sustainable Regions and Global Trade, GIN
> > workshop
> >> at
> >> the School for International Training, Brattleboro, Vermont USA.
> >> July 2-5, 2006: GIN2006, The 13th International Conference of the
> > Greening
> >> of Industry Network, Cardiff University, UK.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
================================================================
Reid J. Lifset, Assoc.
Dir. School of Forestry & Env. Studies
Industrial Environmental Mgmt. Program Yale University
Editor, Journal of Industrial Ecology 205 Prospect Street
203-432-6949 (tel) -5912 (fax) New Haven, CT
06511-2189 USA
reid.lifset@yale.edu
http://mitpress.mit.edu/JIE