Putting Partnerships in their Place: Moral and Material Processes of Place-based Respect, Repair, and Renewal
Submission Deadline: 1stst November 2020
Dr Annmarie Ryan, University of Limerick, Ireland email@example.com ,Dr Oana Branzei Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Canada firstname.lastname@example.orgProfessor Susi Geiger, University College Dublin, Ireland email@example.comDr Helen Haugh Judge School of Business, University of Cambridge, UK firstname.lastname@example.org
Places "move", "touch", or "shatter" us (Cresswell 2004, 2011, 2016, 2018). To more fully specify the functions of place in tackling societal grand challenges (Lawrence & Dover 2015; Onyas, McEachern & Ryan, 2018), we ask how the morality and materiality of the places organizations "(dis)respect" (de la Chaux, Haugh & Greenwood, 2018) and "(re)build" (McKeever, Jack & Anderson, 2015). Places, be they towns, cities or other conurbations, are important sites where the challenges of sustainability are realized, become manifest and make real impacts on people's everyday lives (Borch & Kornberger, 2015). Environmental, social or economic tensions often come to be experienced as of and in places (Callon, 2009; Slawinski, Winsor, Mazutis, Schouden, & Smith, 2019). This special issue invites a closer examination and explanation of the multiple roles place plays in how sustainable worlds are made (Rutland & Aylett, 2008), especially when different types of actors convene in, and interact with fragile ecosystems (De Bakker, et al 2013; Finch, Geiger and Reid, 2017).
We ask how cross-sector partnerships emerge and evolve based on the moral and material concerns specific to lived-in places (Bitzer & Glasbergen, 2010; Offermans & Glasbergen, 2015; Finch, Geiger and Harkness, 2017; Onyas et al. 2018; Peredo, Haugh & McLean, 2018), ranging from coral reefs (Bloomfield & Schleifer, 2017) and forest certification (Burne et al., 2016; D'Antone & Spencer, 2014; Gupta et al., 2016) to unsafe drinking water (Andre, Cho & Laine, 2018) and social inequities (Powell, Hamann, Bitzer & Baker, 2018).
The aim of this call is to bring to the fore the places in which cross-sector partnerships are formed; how they shape the dynamics of partnerships formed and explore how these partnerships come to shape the setting in which they developed. From this perspective partnerships can be viewed as issue networks (Ritvala & Salmi, 2011), hybrid forums (Callon, Lascoume & Barthes, 2009) or meta- organizations (Valente & Oliver, 2019). We call attention to how network of actors that attend to issues unfolding at and across multiple scales (Bansal, Kim & Wood, 2018; Bowen, Bansal & Slawinski, 2018), come to be construed as matters of concern (Callon & Rabeharisoa, 2008), and to borrow from Cochoy (2014) where cross-sector interactions, as mechanisms for managing concerns, may also act as sites for their creation (Cochoy, 2014; Finch, Geiger and Reid, 2017).
Themes for submissions include:
How are multi-stakeholder driven policies practiced or performed in specific settings?
How do the specifics of a place affect the nature and role of partnerships in sustainable
policy making and implementation?
How do eco-systems co-evolve by actively engaging the ethics of place and place-making?
How are places themselves shaped and performed in the design and practices of specific sustainability initiatives?
How does place pattern multi-actor partnerships? In partnering with businesses, how do NGOs engage the morality and materiality of place to frame or reframe the challenges or issue under consideration? In partnering with NGOSs, how do businesses reconstruct the meaning of the places they inhabit?
How are issues such as sustainability concretized in place and by emplaced identities and interactions?
What is the process of localization and translation of either policy or academic models in cross-sector partnering?
We are particularly interested in "putting partnerships in their place" by more fully specifying how complex cross-sector alliances (SDG 17) engage morally and materially with places ranging from land to water to cities and transitional communities (SDGs 14, 6, 15, and 11). Greater sensitivity to how place constrains and enables organizing (Lawrence, 2017) and the multiple scales implied by wicked issues like climate change (Bowen, Bansal & Slawinski, 2018) can enrich theories of cross- sector partnerships in settings riddled with entrenched inequality (Powell, Hamann, Bitzer & Baker, 2018) and fragility (Welter, Xheneti & Smallbone, 2018).
The morality and materiality inherent in places repeatedly reset the reference points for partners (André, Cho & Laine, 2018) by triggering epiphanies (Dentoni, Pascucci, Poldner & Gartner, 2018). Successful partnerships redefine the meaning of places (Howard-Grenville, Metzger & Meyer, 2013; Peredo, Haugh & McLean, 2018). Eco-systems co-evolve with the places they emerge in (Autio, Nambisan, Thomas & Wright, 2018), and place itself is often a critical resource in how eco-systems evolve (Thompson, Purdy & Ventresca, 2018).
This special issue will encourage cross-pollination between the ethics of place (Smith, 2001) and place-making (Lindstedt, 2011), bringing concepts like place detachment and attachment (Kibler, Fink, Lang & Munoz, 2015; Li & Chan, 2018; Rouse, 2016; Stedman, 2002) to the forefront and deliberately "emplace" theories of cross-sector partnering. Submissions will recognize the intricacy and inherent plasticity of the places to rethink how organizations relate to place (Guthey et al. 2014; Hoelscher & Alderman, 2004), and theorize with data how places de- and re-stabilize communities (Steyaert & Katz, 2004). We will also invite place-sensitive forms of knowing (Offermans & Glasbergen, 2015), welcoming indigenous scholarship and methodologies that honor the voices of silent or displaced actors, such as species depending on natural ecosystems or the homeless or refugees transitioning in between places or living in temporary places. The special issue will contribute a set of place-sensitive theories of partnering that go beyond specifying the context in which partnerships take place (Bitzer & Glasbergen, 2010; Gaddefors & Anderson, 2019) to study places as performative (Gieryn, 2000). Our aim is to begin explaining how the morality and materiality of places fundamentally pattern which partnerships are (in) feasible and why they are (un) desirable (Callon, 2009; Cochoy, 2014; Korsgaard, Ferguson & Gaddefors, 2015; Finch, Geiger and Reid, 2017).
Submissions are welcomed from a variety of theoretical, methodological, and disciplinary perspectives, as long as they are closely in line with the topic of the Special Issue. Author guidelines are provided on the website of the Journal of Business Ethics. Please note that all manuscripts need to be submitted through the Editorial Manager (https://www.editorialmanager.com/busi/default.aspx) by 1st November 2020, whilst indicating that it is a submission to this Special Issue. Please note that a paper submitted to this special issue cannot be resubmitted to a regular issue at the JBE. Journal of Business Ethics
Abdelnour, S. and Branzei, O. (2009). The renaissance of community enterprise in postwar Sudan, Administrative Sciences Association of Canada Best Paper Proceedings, Niagara Falls (Recipient of the Best Paper Award Entrepreneurship & Family Business).
André, K., Cho, C. & Laine, M. (2018). Reference points for measuring social performance: Case study of a social business venture, Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 660-678.
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L.D.W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72-95.
Bansal, P., Kim, A. K., & Wood, M. O. (2017). Hidden in plain sight: The importance of scale on organizational attention to issues. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 217–241.
Bitzer, V., & Glasbergen, P. (2010). Partnerships for sustainable change in cotton: An institutional analysis of African cases. Journal of Business Ethics 93, no. 2 (2010): 223-240.
Bloomfield, M.J., & Schleifer, P. (2017). Tracing dailure in non-state market-driven governance: The case of coral reef protection. Governance, 17 (4), 127-146.
Bowen, F.E., Bansal, T. & Slawinski, N (2018). Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions, Strategic Management Journal, 39:1411–1436.
Borch, Christian, and Martin Kornberger, eds. (2015) Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge, 2015.
Burns, S. l., Yapura, P. F. & Giessen, L (2016). State actors and international forest certification policy: Coalitions be- hind FSC and PEFC in federal Argentina. Land Use Policy, 52, 23–29
Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 535-548.
Callon, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2018) "The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French association of neuromuscular disease patients." Science, Technology, & Human Values 33(2): 230-261.
Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. "Acting in an uncertain world. An essay on technological democracy." (2009).
Cochoy, F. (2014). Concerned markets: facing the future, beyond 'interested' and 'contested' markets. Concerned markets: Economic ordering for multiple values, p.238.
Cresswell, T (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Cresswell, T. (2016). Understanding mobility holistically: The case of Hurricane Katrina, in Tore
Sager (Ed), The Ethics of Mobilities: Rethinking Place, Exclusion, Freedom and Environment, Chapter 7: 145-156.
Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (2011). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects, Ashgate Publishing.
Cresswell. T. (2018). Landscape and the obliteration of practice. In:Handbook of Cultural Geography, Kay Anderson, Mona Domosh, Steve Pile & Nigel Thrift (Eds), Chapter 13.
Cuba, L., & Hummon, D.M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(1), 111-131.
D'Antone, S. & Spencer, R. (2014). "Concerns and marketization: the case of sustainable palm oil."
Concerned markets: economic ordering for multiple values. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham UK (2014): 72-101.
de la Chaux, M., Haugh, H., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Organizing refugee camps: "Respected space" and "listening posts", Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(2), 155–179.
Dentoni, D., Pascucci, S., Poldner, K., & Gartner, W.B. (2018). Learning "who we are" by doing: Processes of co-constructing prosocial identities in community-based enterprises, Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 603-622.
Fathallah, R., Branzei, O., & Schaan, J. L. (2018). No place like home? How EMNCs from hyper turbulent contexts internationalize by sequentially arbitraging rents, values, and scales abroad. Journal of World Business, 53 (5), 620-631.
Frantzeskaki, N., van Steenbergen, F., & Stedman, R.C. (2018). Sense of place and experimentation in urban sustainability transitions: The Resilience Lab in Carnisse, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Sustainability Science, 13, 1045-1059.
Finch, John, Geiger, S. and Harkness, R. (2017). Marketing and Compromising for Sustainability: Competing Orders of Worth in the North Atlantic. Marketing Theory, 17(1), 71-93.
Finch, J., Geiger, S. and Reid, E. (2017). Technologically captured? How material agency supports interaction between regulators and industrial actors. Research Policy, 46, 160-170.
De Bakker, F., Den Hond, F., King, B. & Weber, K. (2013). Social movements, civil society and
corporations: Taking stock and looking ahead.
, 34 (5-6), 573-593.
Gaddefors, J., & Anderson, A. (2019). Context maters: Entrepreneurial energy in the revival of place. In Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking through Multi-voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates, Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, Volume 9A, 113- 127, Emerald Publishing Ltd.
Gieryn, T.F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463-496. Gupta, A. Pistorius, T & Vijge, (2016). Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: the REDD+ Partnership as bridge organization. International Environmental
Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 355–374.Journal of Management Inquiry, 23
Hoelscher, S., & Alderman, D.H. (2004). Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social Culture & Geography, 5(3): 347-355.
Howard-Grenville, J., Metzger, M.L., & Meyer, A.D. (2013). Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1): 113–136.
Kibler, E., Fink, M., Lang, R., & Muñoz, P. (2015). Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 3, 24-29.
Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R., & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds: How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 27(9-10), 574-598.
Lawrence, T. (2017). High-stakes institutional translation: Establishing North America's first government-sanctioned supervised injection site, Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1771-1800.
Li, T.E., & Chan, E.T.H. (2018). Connotations of ancestral home: An exploration of place attachment by multiple generations of Chinese diaspora. Population, Space and Place, 24(8), e2147.
Lindstedt, J. (2011). Place, identity and the socially responsible construction of place brands, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 791): 42-49.
Marsden, T. (2013). Sustainable place-making for sustainability science: The contested case of agri- food and urban-rural relations. Sustainability Science, 8, 213-226.
McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re- construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 50-65.
Muñoz, P., Kimmitt, J., Kibler, E., & Farny, S. (2018): Living on the slopes: entrepreneurial preparedness in a context under continuous threat, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, DOI:10.1080/08985626.2018.1541591
Offermans, A. & Pieter Glasbergen, P. (2015). Boundary work in sustainability partnerships: an exploration of the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil. Environmental Science & Policy, 50, 34-45.
Onyas, W.I, McEachern, M.G., & Ryan, A. (2018). Co-constructing sustainability: Agencing sustainable coffee farmers in Uganda. Journal of Rural Studies, 61: 12-21.
Peredo, A.M., Haugh, H.M., & McLean, M. (2018). Common property: Uncommon forms of prosocial organizing, Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 591-602.
Guthey, G. T., Whiteman, G., & Elmes, M. (2014). Place and sense of place: Implications for
organizational studies of sustainability.
Lawrence, T. & Dover, G. (2015). Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-
house, Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 371-410.
Powell, E.E., Hamann, R., Bitzer, V. & Baker, T (2018). Bringing the elephant into the room? Enacting conflict in collective prosocial organizing, Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 623-642.
Ritvala, T. & Salmi, A. (2011). Network mobilizers and target firms: The case of saving the Baltic Sea. Industrial Marketing Management 40(6), 887-898.
Rouse, E. (2016). Beginning's end: How founders psychologically disengage from their organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1605-1629.
Rutland, T. & Aylett, A. (2008). The work of policy: Actor networks, governmentality, and local action on climate change in Portland, Oregon. Environment and Planning D: society and space, 26(4), 627-646.
Shulist, P., and Branzei, O. (2018). With a Little Help from (Where I See) My Friends: Social and Spatially Embedded Learning in Ghana, Academy of Management Conference, Chicago.
Slawinski, N., Winsor, B., Mazutis, D., Schouten, J.W., & Smith, W. (2019). Managing the paradoxes of place to foster regeneration, Organization & Environment, Special issue on Regenerative Organizing.
Smith, M. (2001). An ethics of place: Radical ecology, postmodernity, and social theory, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stedman, R.C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment & Behavior, 34(5), 561-581.
Steyaert, C. & Katz, J. (2004). Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: Geographical, discursive, and social dimensions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(3), 179- 196.
Thompson, T., Purdy, L., & Ventresca, M. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96-116.
Warren, L., Anderson, A., & Bensemann, J. (2019). Resistance and change in a depleted community: Personal, pragmatic, and paradoxical. In Creating Entrepreneurial Space: Talking through Multi-voices, Reflections on Emerging Debates, Volume 9A, 113-127, Emerald Publishing Ltd.
Warren, L., Anserson, A., & Bensemann, J. (in press). Identity, enactment, and entrepreneurship engagement in a declining place. Journal of Small Business Management.
Welter, F., Xheneti, M. & Smallbone, D. (2018). Entrepreneurial resourcefulness in unstable institutional contexts: The example of European Union borderlands, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 23-53.